The Preservation of Our Clans

In case folks are stopping by…

I have not abandoned this blog even though I haven’t posted in ages. Gosh, there is SO MUCH to post. I have been reading a lot and keeping abreast of things and having good, fruitful conversations with people on the topic. Basically what it boils down to is that the Muslims are still acting like stark, raving maniacs, and their jihad–both stealth and bloody–continues unabated and unchecked. However, I’m just not in a place to devote time to posting. I’m kind of in a transition period with work/life and also I’m doing lots of research on other things for a project I have to do and at the end of the day I just don’t feel like looking at the computer screen anymore. I also have taken a hiatus from some blogs and forums that I regularly post/comment at. I will be back in the saddle shortly.

Anyway, I shall be posting soon. In the meantime I leave you with these salient thoughts from the great master, Confucius. Take it to heart, ya’ll.

The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved.

* haven’t posted any cutie photos lately, either. so here’s one of korea’s greatest and most beloved actors, jang dong-gun. i want that shirt.

[OT] Worn Out From Life

Click here if you want to see what I look like during a typical day at the office.

Will the REAL Enemy of Islam Please Stand Up

Our friend Creeping Sharia (I can’t stress enough that this is one of the best anti-jihad blogs on the web–Creeping Sharia cuts straight to the heart of Islamic jihad in America. If you want to stay informed about Islamic activity in our beloved country, you need to read that blog) has posted an excellent article by the Middle East Media Research Insititute (popularly known as MEMRI) that essentially blames Muslims themselves as the real enemy of Islam, which I believe to be 100% true. It’s a great article and very, very useful in dialogue with clueless people who think Islam is a religion of peace, and that Muslims are just acting out because they are poor and frustrated, and that “most” of them love the West and want to live in peaceful co-existence with non-Muslims. Read the whole thing here.

“How many prisoners are locked up in Muslim prisons for their opinions, ideas, and cultural identity? Is it in the spirit of Islam that Muslims are fleeing their homeland for ‘heretical’ countries in order to attain security and live in dignity?… Is it in the spirit of Islam to be silent in the face of the tyranny of rulers? Is it in the spirit of Islam that one family should rule over an entire people? Is it in the spirit of Islam that some Muslim countries abound in magnificent palaces while 60% of their population is illiterate? Is it in the spirit of Islam to turn a blind eye to a billionaire’s several profligate satellite channels, whose programs make a mockery of religion and morality, only because [this billionaire] has [also] launched a religious channel?… The truth is that the biggest enemy of Islam is the Muslims themselves, because they have relinquished all decency in dealing with others, as well as the courage to oppose oppression…” [1]

“The Muslim nations must first and foremost purge themselves of [elements] that use Islam and its teachings as a disguise [i.e.] in order to present their crimes against humanity as jihad in the name of Allah… It is inconceivable that the teachings [of Islam] should justify the murder of dozens, [even] thousands, of innocent people. It is such iniquities that have corrupted the image of Islam in the eyes of non-Muslims…

“[Muslim] nations must adopt the language of reason… in order to deal with the attacks on [Islam], and to wage war against ‘Islamic’ extremism, which has distorted Muslim religious teachings…

Of course, what Muslim nations really need to do is purge themselves of Islam altogether, since it’s impossible to purge themselves of certain “elements” of Islam that are incompatible with human decency and modern civilization. Islam cannot be purged of parts of itself. It is a solid, cohesive entity. You either embrace it in its totality or you reject it in is totality.

China Meets Its Match

UPDATE: Yup, in case anyone had any doubt, jihad is on in China:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022082.php

But the Olympics will likely be safer than any other country with an active jihadist threat, because the Chinese don’t take shit from anyone and they WILL profile:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022083.php

————————–

China, meet Islamic jihad.

Islamic jihad, meet China.

Now that the introductions are over…

I’ve been watching the situation in China since it started getting reported in the mainstream media about every week, mainly since the Beijing Olympics started coming more and more to the public’s attention. There is one major reason that jihad in China is particularly interesting to me. I have a few friends who are living in the States but are native Chinese. All of them told me about a year ago that “there are Muslims who have been in China for more than 500 years and they are completely moderate and totally Chinese. They live like everyone else and the women don’t even wear veils. They have never caused in problems for China.” Since I tend to be a pessimistic person by nature my initial instinct was that this assessment was total bullshit. Not that what my friends were saying wasn’t true, just that they are clueless about the nature of Islamic jihad and ignorant of the true meaning of “moderate” and “peaceful co-existence” when it comes to Islam. I know that Islam is in the world to dominate wherever it is. Period. So I thought it would only be a matter of time before China’s sleeping dragon awoke. And so, it seems that my instinct was right, as we have witnessed for the past few months, leading up to this catastrophe:

Sixteen Chinese policemen have been killed in an attack on a border post in the restive Muslim region of Xinjiang, state media say.Two attackers reportedly drove up to the post in a rubbish truck and threw two grenades, before moving in to attack the policemen with knives.

The attack came four days before the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games….

Fourteen policemen died at the scene and two on the way to hospital. Another 16 policemen were hurt….

Xinjiang, in the north-west of the country, is home to the Muslim Uighur people. Uighur separatists have waged a low-level campaign against Chinese rule for decades.

Human rights groups say Beijing is suppressing the rights of Uighurs.

The BBC’s Daniel Griffiths in Beijing says China has spoken in the past of what it calls a terrorist threat from Muslim militants in Xinjiang, but it has provided little evidence to back up its claims….

Last week, a senior Chinese army officer warned that Islamic separatists were the biggest danger to the Olympics.

Col Tian Yixiang of the Olympics security command centre told reporters the main threat came from the “East Turkestan terrorist organisation”.

The term is used by the government to refer to Islamist separatists in Xinjiang.

Late last month a group called the Turkestan Islamic Party said it had blown up buses in Shanghai and Yunnan, killing five people.

But China denied that the explosions were acts of terrorism.

The Washington-based IntelCenter, which monitors terrorism communications, said the Turkestan Islamic Party had released a video entitled Our Blessed Jihad in Yunnan.

In it, the group’s leader, Commander Seyfullah, said it was responsible for several attacks and threatened the Olympics.

“The Chinese have haughtily ignored our warnings,” IntelCenter quoted him as saying.

“The Turkestan Islamic Party volunteers… have started urgent actions.”…

These thugs and brutes have made numerous threats against innocent people attending the Olympics. God only knows what will happen in the next week.

Italy: Soldiers Deployed to Fight Street Crime

How bad do you think street crime has to be in order for the military to be called in? Have YOU ever had the military called in to YOUR town to fight street crime? And, note that one of the spots they are deployed is to an immigrant center. Can you guess who these immigrants are? I posted back in April about the appalling number of illegal migrants in Italy that are so hateful and show such disregard for Italian law and western civilization that Italy’s PM called them “an army of evil”. Italy has a serious problem with unchecked illegal immigration of people from North Africa (Libyans and others) who are Muslims (not that the media will tell you this, hoping that most people aren’t smart enough to connect the dots–and guess what? Most people aren’t smart enough) who have a long-standing hatred of the West. Anyway:

ROME – The Defense Ministry says hundreds of soldiers have been deployed in cities across Italy as part of government measures to fight street crime.

In Rome, some 400 men and women are deployed at subway and railway stations and at an immigrant center. They are not expected to be immediately deployed in the capital’s historic center.

In Milan, they are patrolling the Duomo cathedral and sensitive sites such as the U.S. consulate and the synagogue.

Lt. Col. Mario Busi says the deployment of soldiers — 3,000 in total — began Monday and will continue through the week.

The measure proposed by Premier Silvio Berlusconi’s government was approved by parliament last month and will remain in effect for six months.

The Saudi Commission for the Promotion of Bullshit Bans Cats & Dogs

EDIT: Yes, I know this post looks awful. I tried editing it no less than nine times. WordPress is just being screwy tonight. I’m not able to fix it.

This should come as no surprise. I mean, it’s pathetic. But it’s not surprising.

Saudi Capital Bans Sale of Dogs, Cats

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (July 31) – Every single man knows: Walking a dog in the park is a sure babe magnet. Saudi Arabia’s Islamic religious police, in their zeal to keep the sexes apart, want to make sure the technique doesn’t catch on here.
The solution: Ban selling dogs and cats as pets, as well as walking them in public.
[MV: Since Islamic laws have so many prohibitions that are seemingly aimed at protecting Muslim men (women driving, women being outside their homes without a male relative, women having their face, skin, and hair uncovered, dogs, alcohol…the list goes on) wouldn’t it save everyone a lot of trouble to just ban Muslim men from walking around in public? I mean, they seem to be the ones who can’t cope with life and whose sensibilities are so delicate that all sorts of laws have to be invented to make them comfortable and to keep them from doing bad things, it would be easier to just force them to stay indoors. Wouldn’t it?]
The prohibition went into effect Wednesday in the capital, Riyadh, and authorities in the city say they will strictly enforce it — unlike previous bans in the cities of Mecca and Jiddah, which have been ignored and failed to stop pet sales.
Violators found outside with their pets will have their beloved poodles and other furry companions confiscated by agents of the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, the official name of the religious police, tasked with enforcing Saudi Arabia’s strict Islamic code.
[MV: Just unbelievable bullshit. Who in their right mind stays in a religion that has a “morality police”? Poor brainwashed and pitifully deceived humans, that’s who.]
The commission’s general manager, Othman al-Othman, said the ban was ordered because of what he called “the rising of phenomenon of men using cats and dogs to make passes at women and pester families” as well as “violating proper behavior in public squares and malls.”
[MV: Here’s my question–in Saudi Arabia the women are required by strict law to always be in the company of a male relative and to have their hair and bodies covered. So, why are Muslim men trying to make passes at them?? Clearly, these women are following Islamic law, are they not? So why doesn’t Saudi Arabia just pass a law that any man caught “making passes at women” should be forced to forfeit his right to be outdoors in public? I mean, the women are apparently trying to be virtuous. It seems to me it’s the Muslim men who lack the self-control to behave themselves. It’s not the fault of the women, the dogs or the cats. It’s Muslim men who lack the ability to control themselves and treat women with respect and dignity.]
“If a man is caught with a pet, the pet will be immediately confiscated and the man will be forced to sign a document pledging not to repeat the act,” al-Othman told the Al-Hayat newspaper. “If he does, he will be referred to authorities.” The ban does not address women.
[MV: This is all so silly. It reads like a satire. Only it’s real! Islam is so clearly the dumbest fucking religion on the planet.]
The Saudi-owned Al-Hayat announced the ban in its Wednesday edition, saying it was ordered by the acting governor of Riyadh province, Prince Sattam, based on an edit from the Council of Senior Islamic Scholars and several religious police reports of pet owners harassing women and families. Commission authorities often do not formally announce to the public new rules that they intend to implement. Officials from the commission and Riyadh city government could not be reached for comment Thursday, which is a weekend day in Saudi Arabia. The English-language Arab News reported on the ban Thursday.
So far, the prohibition did not appear to have any effect in Riyadh. It’s extremely rare, anyway, to see anyone in the capital walking a dog — much less carrying a cat in public — despite the authorities’ claims of flirtatious young men luring girls with their pets in malls.
[MV: That’s because dogs are not halal in the Islamic religion. Technically it’s just their saliva that’s haram, but many Muslims won’t have them around altogether. Dogs are just another thing that offends Muslims. Is there anything that doesn’t offend Muslims? If you think of something, post me a comment.]
Salesmen at a couple of Riyadh pet stores said Thursday they did not receive any orders from the commission banning the sale of pets. Cats and dogs were still on display.
“I didn’t hear of the ban,” said Yasser al-Abdullah, a 28-year-old Saudi nurse, who was at one pet store with his 3-month-old collie, Joe. Al-Abdullah, who also owns an 8-month-old Labrador, said a couple of Western friends had been told to get off the streets by the religious police for walking their dogs.
“I won’t allow the commission to take my dogs from me,” he said.
[MV: Oh really, Pancho? Whachu gonna do about it? I mean, really. Such a statement is so preposterous. No Muslim can defy or even question Islam or Islamic rules and regulations. Keep dreaming, Panchito.]
The religious police prowl streets and malls throughout the kingdom, ensuring unmarried men and women do not mix, confronting women they feel are not properly covered or urging men to go to prayers.
[MV: Again, so satirical. They are prowling the streets in search of evil men with dogs and cats out to corrupt the morals and virtue of Muslim women and families. But I bet those same men would be lauded as heroes if they like, flew a plane into an American building.] 
They also often make attempts to plug the few holes in the strict gender segregation that innovations bring. In 2004, for example, they tried to ban cameras on cell phones, fearing that men and women would exchange pictures of each other — though the prohibition was quickly revoked.
[MV: LOL. (rolls @@ eyes)]
There was no word whether commission authorities intend to expand the dog and cat ban beyond the capital. The prohibition may be more of an attempt to curb the owning of pets, which conservative Saudis view as a sign of corrupting Western influence, like the fast food, shorts, jeans and pop music that have become more common in the kingdom.
Although it has never been common to own pets in the Arab world, it’s becoming increasingly fashionable among the upper class in Saudi Arabia and other countries such as Egypt.
In Islamic tradition, dogs are shunned as unclean and dangerous, though they are kept for hunting and guarding. In large cities around the Middle East, stray dogs are considered pests.
[MV: Dogs are man’s best friends, you backwards morons.]
The ban on cats is more puzzling, since there’s no similar disdain for them in Islamic tradition.
One of the Prophet Muhammad’s closest companions was given the name Abu Huraira, Arabic for “the father of the kitten,” because he always carried a kitten with him and a number of traditional stories of the prophet show Muhammad encouraging people to treat cats well.
[MV: Huraira probably used the poor little thing for sexual purposes.]

Olmert Resigns: Don’t Let the Door Hit Ya Where the Good Lord Split Ya

This just in. Ehud Olmert–quite possibly the worst Prime Minister to ever be foisted upon the State of Israel–is resigning. Thank GOD. I only hope someone worse doesn’t take his place. Olmert is a full-blown dhimmi and spineless and a coward and not a good Jew. The Israelis right now simply cannot handle another PM of Olmert’s sub-standard kind. Ideally I would love to see another Golda Meir for Israel but I’ll settle for a Benjamin Netanyahu type.

“Pray for the peace of Jerusalem:
they that love thee shall prosper.
Peace be within thy walls, and prosperity within thy palaces.
For my brethren and companions’ sakes, I will say now,
peace be within thee.
For the sake of the House of the Lord our God I will seek thy good. “

                              — Psalm 122

Israeli PM to resign, won’t run in party primary
JERUSALEM – Facing burgeoning corruption allegations and plummeting popularity, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said Wednesday he will resign in September, throwing Israel into political turmoil and raising doubts about prospects for peace with the Palestinians and Syria.

Olmert said he would not run in his party’s primary election Sept. 17 and would step down afterward to allow his successor to form a government. But because of Israel’s political system, he could serve until well into next year.

His decision will end a long public career that has been clouded by allegations of corruption that have battered him in recent months.

Olmert’s popularity dropped below 20 percent at one point after his bloody but inconclusive war in Lebanon in 2006.

Political analysts had been predicting his resignation for weeks as details of the latest allegations against him dominated the news.

The most damaging inquiry focuses on Morris Talansky, a 76-year-old American Jewish businessman who testified that he handed envelopes stuffed with tens of thousands of dollars to Olmert before he became prime minister, in part financing a luxurious lifestyle of expensive hotels and fat cigars.

Talansky gave lengthy public testimony for days in a Jerusalem courtroom, defending his allegations under cross-examination by Olmert’s attorneys — although Olmert has never been formally charged with a crime.

The latest allegation was that Olmert double and triple-billed trips abroad to Jewish institutions, pocketing the difference or financing trips for relatives. Other allegations include a shady real estate deal and questionable political appointments — all before he became premier.

Olmert’s brief address from his official Jerusalem residence included harsh criticism of the police investigations. He said he was choosing the public good over personal justice. Although he has consistently denied wrongdoing, he had pledged to resign if indicted.

“I was forced to defend myself against relentless attacks from self-appointed ‘fighters for justice’ who sought to depose me from my position, when the ends sanctified all the means,” Olmert said, appearing angry and reading from a text.

He did not answer questions from reporters gathered in his courtyard.

Of course he didn’t. The guilty and the treacherous and the weak-willed and the soft of spirit don’t like answering questions.

Read the rest here.

** that photo up top is the great and noble golda meir.

Rage Against America

It almost seems like if you’re Muslim, you have to hate America. It’s like part of a package deal or something. I mean, how can it not be so given that Islam teaches that the Koran and Sharia are above all governments and constitutions, And that Islam must dominate the whole earth from the top of every mountain to the bottom of every valley, and given that Americans are all so hedonistic and all (big eye-roll here, in honor of the bullshit excuse I’m sick of hearing, that Muslims react the way they do because American immorality offends their delicate sensitivies). Now, I’m sure this ISN’T the case for every single Muslim living in the U.S. but I’ve never seen any blogs, websites, newspaper columns, talk show pieces, books, or marching in the streets from ANY faithful, Koran-believing Muslims in America. Have you? Let me get to my point…

I was catching up on the posts of one of my favorite anti-Jihad blogs, Creeping Sharia, which I haven’t had a chance to look at in a couple weeks. And what do I find? NUMEROUS postings about Islamic rage against America. The fact is, a vast majority of Muslims in America hate this country, and since there are vast numbers of liberals and communists in America that hate this country, too, they make excellent bed-fellows with the Muslims. There are a few Muslims who love this country, I’m absolutely sure, because they are smart enough to know that this country allows them the freedom to practice the very religion they love but without all the oppression and tyranny that goes along with in Islamic-dominant countries. Then there is the so-called “silent majority”…well, we just don’t know what they feel about America, do we? Because they are just so damned…silent.

So next time someone tells you that the Muslims in America love it here, are peacefully co-existing with non-Muslims, and are moderate lovers of freedom…show them this post and tell them to eat it.

Muslim Honor Killings In America (Video) (Papa Don’t Preach, it’s more than just a Madonna song!)

Muslim Day at Six Flags (Too good to ride roller coasters with the filthy kuffir)

Subway Ad Campaign Imam a Dirty Jihadist, Says America Should Become Muslim (Not on my life, buddy. And you can have my neck. You ain’t takin’ my religion.)

CAIR (Council for Islamic Bullshit in America) knew Subway Ad Imam Was a Dirty Jihadist (CAIR is official Islamic mouthpiece in America, but they are constipated liars who hate the U.S.)

Muslim Women Sue McDonald’s (You can bet there’s going to be lots more where this came from. Just look at the UK.)

Vermont Cable Carrying Al-Jezeera (Bending over.)

American Lawyer Wants to Sue the United States on Behalf of Iran (You had to read that twice, didn’t you?)

New Memorial to “Honor” the Heroes of Flight 93 Features Islamic Crescent (Hood-winked.)

Islamic Evangelization On NYC Subways Sponsored by America-hating Imam (Sign of the times.)

U.S. Government Passes Law to Forbid Use of Dirty Words (Dirty words like “jihad”, “sharia”, “caliphate”, and “Islamofascism”. The refusal to identity and name your enemy is the first signal of defeat.)

Translator Scandals: Muslim Linguists Infiltrate U.S. Gov’t Agencies (It sounds like the synopsis of a Hollywood Spy Thriller. But it’s not.)

This list could go on and on and on. But I just don’t have the time and energy to post any more. You get the point. The hills are alive…with the sound of jihad.

** And this is depressing. So we need a cutie photo. I just love an excuse for a cutie photo. Above, Korean actress Do-Yeon Jeon. Because she’s my favorite Korean actress and I just found out she’s pregnant with her first baby. Congrats to Do-Yeon and her hubby!

Iraqi Christians Form Militia to Defend Against Jihadists

The last thing I want to have to see is Christians taking up arms. But they’re fed up and they’re not gonna take it anymore. Would I do the same? I’m sure I would. Would you?

Iraqi Christians form militias to combat jihadist encroachment.

[They are paid less than other approved local militias around the country, and they are “only authorised when they act as auxiliaries to the Iraqi police.” But in spite of threats, they are no longer completely defenseless.]

“Iraq’s Christians form new militias to combat Islamic extremists,” by Damien McElroy for the Telegraph, July 27:

In the five years since the Anglo-American invasion of 2003, murders and abductions have driven about half of the 800,000 Christians who once lived in Iraq to flee the country.

Checkpoints manned by civilians armed with heavy machine guns and assault rifles have received official backing in Christian villages on the Ninevah plain in northern Iraq, where their presence dates back to the missions of St Thomas the apostle.

Father Yusuf Yohannes combines the duties of parish priest with overseeing security from a converted post office in the village of Karamlis, 10 miles east of the local capital, Mosul. Informal patrols by his parishioners started last year but the effort is now a fully-fledged operation, with 250 employees and official approval from the US army base in Mosul.

“We are facing the threat of wipe-out,” he said. “I have not left this town in three years because of the danger. The situation here was like a bowl without a base for Christians, we were just tossed around. By establishing our own security we have the chance to stand steady again.”

Radios supplied by the US-led coalition keeps the command post in touch with guards in Karamlis and three hamlets nearby. A heavy machine gun protrudes from the guardpost on St Barbara Street, pointing towards a road shared with Sunni Muslim neighbours. The gun’s purpose, said Saleem Yusuf, the checkpoint commander, is to deter would-be car bombers. “We have not used it in anger yet. Thank God,” he said.

Iraq’s most senior primate, Cardinal Emmanuel Delly, made a public plea for military assistance for “defenceless” Christians in March. The persecuted minority was at it lowest point, reeling after loss of the political protection it had enjoyed from previous regimes over the last century, ranging from British colonial authorities to Iraq’s monarchy and Saddam Hussein’s government.

But local politicians in Mosul opposed the obvious route to Christian self defence – the creation of militias, equipped and armed by the coalition, a model pivotal to the dramatic drop in violence elsewhere in Iraq.

[After all, Sharia law forbids dhimmi populations from bearing arms.]

These objections have now been dropped, but Christian village guards are still only authorised when they act as auxiliaries to the Iraqi police. Consequently, the guards in Karamlis are paid only £100 a month, compared with the £150 given to militiamen elsewhere in the country.

But the patrols have already had an impact. New buildings are going up in Christian areas and there is a renewed willingness to resist the demands of Muslim radicals. “Why should Christians face arrest for not fasting in Ramadan?” asked Fr Yusuf. “Why is it that women should cover their faces if God loves all human beings? We reject these things and want the right to our own culture.” [MV: I LOVE that line about women covering their faces!!]

Cardinal Delly was able to travel to Karamlis for an ordination last Friday. The man he raised to the priesthood symbolises the ordeal of Iraq’s last Christians. Yusuf Rabat assumed the title “Father Paulos” in tribute to the late Archbishop of Mosul, Paulos Farai Rakha, who was kidnapped and murdered four months ago. Pictures of the dead Archbishop are pasted on lamposts across Karamlis.

Posted by Marisol at Dhimmi Watch, the sister site of Jihad Watch: http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/021966.php

Blind, Deaf, and Dumb Kumbaya Liberalism

UPDATE: Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch has some real good commentary on Obama’s views on Islamic jihad as well.

Michelle Malkin has penned an excellent article on Barack “The Golden Calf” Obama’s pitiful and ignorant views on Islam and jihad, and its threat to our way of life and the world at large. Michelle astutely describes Obama’s clueless naivete as “blind, deaf, and dumb Kumbaya liberalism”. Exerpt of the article below. Full text here. It’s a real good read.

You’ll note, too, that Obama’s fresh instinct in the week after the 9/11 attack was to diagnose it as a “tragedy” stemming from lack of “empathy” and “understanding”–instead of yet another deliberate, carefully planned evil act of the long-waged Islamic war on the West that it was.

As for Obama’s continued delusion about the “climate of poverty and ignorance” that supposedly breeds Muslim terrorists, can American politicians ever rid themselves of this unreality-based trope? This belief is part and parcel of the same idiocy that lead the State Department to embrace “spa days” for Muslims to “build bridges” with the Arab world and President Bush to open up our aviation schools to more Saudi students to “improve understanding.” John McCain also alluded to education-as-cure for Islamic terrorism at the L.A. World Affairs Council in March, when he declared that “In this struggle, scholarships will be far more important than smart bombs.” Just what we need: more student visas for the jihadi-infested nation that sent us the bulk of the 9/11 hijackers.

And as I’ve reported before and must reiterate again for the hard of hearing in Washington, lowering academic standards at American colleges helped al Qaeda mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed further the jihadi cause. In the early 1980s, he enrolled at tiny Chowan College in Murfreesburo, N.C., which had dropped its English requirements to attract–ahem–wealthy Middle Easterners.

There’s an extremely strong likelihood that this man is going to be our next President. For 4 years and possibly for 8 years. When you consider the sheer depth of his lack of experience, his cluelessness, his lack of conviction (about anything at all), and his drive for manipulating and deceiving Americans with empty rhetoric, there is plenty of reason to be very, very worried about not only the safety of our nation but also the safety of our allies when he takes Office.

I have said it before and I’ll say it again: At this moment in human history we are facing a clear and present danger–the threat of global jihad, the spread of Islam, and the subjugation of all free people to the tyrannical Islamic law called Sharia. This is a threat to the world at large but as far as America is concerned we have probably not faced a threat like this in the entire history of our young nation. At this moment that we are facing such grave danger to our way of life and to the future that our children will inherit, we need to be very concerned and not take lightly how harmful the Obama Presidency will be. It would be a gross underestimation to write him off as just another politician that we don’t like, just another liar, just another ambitious Machiavelli. Hell, we survived 8 years of Clinton and 8 years of Bush, so we’ll survive Obama. Right? WRONG. The difference is not in the man. The difference is in the period of history we are living in. We simply cannot afford Barack Obama as President right now. Maybe 20 years ago we could afford 4 years of this charlatan, but not now.

* and our photo for alleviation of depression today is Korean actor Yong Joon Bae. because he makes me happy.

“Your Feet Are Still At The End Of Your Legs, You Know”

UPDATE: Robert Spencer has more on this. “Omar is not a kid that was just snatched up off the street somewhere and has been wrongly charged and judged unfairly. I think he is precisely where he needs to be. He’s earned that stay.”…”

I’m talking about the 16 year old Canadian boy who was interrogated at Guantanemo Bay and charged with the murder of a U.S. medic. Damn little lyin’ killer boy. He could murder a U.S. medic in cold blood, doin’ allah’s will, but when interrogated he breaks down like a baby and cries for his mother. Sure, he was a child soldier and yes he should be rehabilitated. But he should be made to answer some damn questions first. Crying for his mother does not show remorse for his actions nor does it show cooperation with the authorities. He killed a man and he’s pointing to bruises on his own body. Hmm. Let’s see. Bruises. Death. Bruises. Death. Yeah, I’d say if I were him I would shut up about the bruises. Doesn’t this boy want to change his life? Doesn’t he want to be free of this murderous, inhumane ideology that was forced on him? This is his chance to do something, in some way, to start a new path. Just answer the damn questions instead of playing victim. YOU KILLED A MAN. And would have killed more if given the chance. Because that’s the only life you have when Islam calls you to jihad.

You gotta read this shiz. The kid is sitting there with two good eyes and two good feet, claiming he “lost everything” after he has killed a man. Um, okay.

OTTAWA (Reuters) – Omar Khadr, the only western prisoner still held in the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, broke down and wept when questioned by Canadian interrogators, video footage released on Tuesday shows.

Khadr, a Canadian, was arrested in Afghanistan in 2002 at the age of 15 and is charged with killing a U.S. medic. The secret video was taken in February 2003 and shows Khadr — then 16 — being grilled by officials from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service spy agency.

At one point, when his interrogators are out of the room, Khadr moans repeatedly in a desperate voice as he holds his head in his hands.

The phrase sounded very much like the English words “Kill me,” but a native Arabic speaker from the National Council on Canada-Arab Relations told Reuters that he believed Khadr was in fact saying “Ya ummi,” the Arabic for “my mother.”

The video shows Khadr at a plain wooden table in an apparently windowless cell, and also sitting on a sofa. He wears an orange prison jumpsuit, and at times buries his head in his hands, or pulls at his hair.

“I lost my eyes, I lost my feet, everything,” he says. “No, you still have your eyes and your feet are still at the end of your legs, you know,” responds one Canadian official.

Full article is here.

* and because gutless little child soldiers who kill innocent human beings yet feel no remorse is depressing, there’s some more adorable Jun Ki Lee at the top.

Koran 65:4 (Allah Okays Raping Babies)

(source)

I haven’t been around in a while, I know. I have been kind of busy. For one thing, I’m moving! Wheeeeee! I’ve been at my current location for exactly 3 years and it’s time for a change. So I’m moving 15 minutes away. Yep, 15 minutes. And I mean on foot. After this week I promise to try to get back on track ’cause I know how my fans live for the low-down on the pedophile-warlord false prophet and his false idol god-worshipping moon cult. I won’t disappoint ya.

So for now…Mohammed (Peanuts Be Upon Him) was a big ol’ perv, did ya know? According to the false prophet, his false god “allah” allowed for the molestation and rape of even little babies. I’m not making this up!! Try to read it all, okay…but not if you just had lunch!

To wit:

Muhammad And Pedophilia

When is it OK to have sex with a young girl? Well Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran gave a fatwa about Quran 65.4:

“A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”

There is a reason for this fatwa, the Prophet Muhammad Married a six-year-old named Aisha and had Sex with the girl by the time she was nine:

Muhammad in Islam’s own writings: His sex-life, sexual abuse and pedophilia
by

Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly. Let us investigate how did the prophet live Islam; how did the prophet apply the eternal teachings of god in his daily life? In this search for the historical Muhammad, we will utilize the Islam’s holy books, it’s own writings.
Muhammad’s molestation of baby Aisha

Muhammad fantasized about baby Aisha before soliciting her from her father.

Sahih Bukhari 9.140
Narrated ‘Aisha:
Allah’s apostle said to me, “you were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘if this is from Allah, then it must happen.

Aisha’s father did not approve at first

Aisha’s father, Abu Bakr, wasn’t on board at first, but Muhammad explained how the rules of their religion made it possible. This is similar to the way that present-day cult leaders manipulate their followers into similar concessions.

Sahih Bukhari 7.18
Narrated ‘Ursa:
The prophet asked abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “but I am your brother.” the prophet said, “you are my brother in Allah’s religion and his book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”

Muhammad, 50, marries baby Aisha at age 6

Sahih Bukhari volume 5, book 58, number 234

Narrated Aisha: the prophet engaged (married) me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, um ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became alright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some ansari women who said, “best wishes and Allah’s blessing and a good luck.” then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

Sahih bukhari volume 8, book 73, number 151
Narrated ‘Aisha: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the prophet would call them to join and play with me. (the playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-bari page 143, vol.13)

Muhammad would thigh with baby Aisha

The permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwahs (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad al-Shemary, the question forwarded to the committee by the grand scholar of the committee with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421 (Islamic calendar).

After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply:

As for the prophet, peace and prayer of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age. That is why [the prophet] peace and prayer of Allah be upon him placed his [male] member between her thighs and massaged it softly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his [male] member not like other believers..

Muhammad reserved baby Aisha for himself because she was a virgin and he wanted a virgin

Sahih al-Bukhari, volume 7, book 62, number 17

Narrated jabir bin ‘abdullah:
When I got married, Allah’s apostle said to me, “what type of lady have you married?” I replied, “I have married a matron.” he said, “why, don’t you have a liking for the virgins and for fondling them?” Jabir also said: Allah’s apostle said, “why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you might play with her and she with you?”

Hence, Muhammad’s comments indicate that his reason for marrying Aisha while a young virgin is so that he could fondle and sexually play with her!

Aisha was not the only baby girl Muhammad fantasized about

In the classic history, Sirat Rasul Allah (The Life of Muhammad) by Ibn Ishaq, there is an account in which Muhammad expressed a marital interest in a crawling baby. This event seems to have occurred around the time of the battle of of Badr, when he was about 55 years old. He had married Aisha two years earlier, when he was 53 years of age.

(Suhayli, ii. 79: in the Riwaya of Yunus i. I. Recorded that the apostle saw her (Ummu’lfadl) when she was a baby crawling before him and said, ‘if she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’ but he died before she grew up and sufyan b. Al-aswad b. ‘Abdu’l-asad al-Makhzumi married her and she bore him rizq and lubab… [Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad, Karachi, p. 311]

Muhammad saw Um Habiba the daughter of Abbas while she was fatim (age of nursing) and he said, “if she grows up while I am still alive, I will marry her.” (Musnad Ahmad, number 25636)

Muhammad would bath with and fondle young Aisha

Bukhari (6:298) – Muhammad would take a bath with the little Aisha and fondle her.

Narrated ‘Aisha:
The prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses).

Baby Aisha would wash semen stains off Muhammad’s clothes

Bukhari (4:232) – Muhammad’s wives would wash semen stains out of his clothes, which were still wet from the spot-cleaning even when he went to the mosque for prayers.

Sahih Bukhari volume 1, book 4, number 231:
Narrated Sulaiman bin Aasar:
I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “i used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”

Muhammad consummated baby Aisha when she was 9

Sunaan abu Dawud: book 11, number 2161:

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
I and the apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) used to lie in one cloth at night while I was menstruating. If anything from me smeared him, he washed the same place (that was smeared), and did not wash beyond it. If anything from him smeared his clothe, he washed the same place and did not wash beyond that, and prayed with it (i.e. The clothe).

Muhammad would sexually abuse his wives

Bukhari (6:300) – Muhammad’s wives had to be available for the prophet’s fondling even when they were having their menstrual period.

Bukhari volume 1, book 6, number 299:
Narrated ‘Abdur-rahman bin al-Aswad:
…(on the authority of his father) ‘Aisha said: “Whenever Allah’s apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an izar and start fondling her.” ‘Aisha added, “None of you could control his sexual desires as the prophet could.”

The prophet would do all his wives in one night

Bukhari (62:6)

“The prophet used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives.”

Muhammad also said that it was impossible to treat all wives equally – and it isn’t hard to guess why.

Bukhari (5:268)

“The prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.” I asked Anas, ‘had the prophet the strength for it?’ Anas replied, ‘we used to say that the prophet was given the strength of thirty men. “

Allah promoted this abusive sexual behavior:

“Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” [Q 2:223]

Koran (2:223) likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills. In this verse, Allah also gives divine sanction for anal sex.

According to Islam, Muhammad is the perfection of humanity and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct. He had sex with Aisha at the age of nine, which amounts to rape of a minor. He also left behind an enduring legacy for aged Muslim men to fulfill their carnal desires contrary to natural law and to the life-long devastation of young girls.


Allah promotes pedophilia

Quran 65.4 “and those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘iddah (prescribed divorce period), if you have doubts (about their periods), is three months, and for those who have no courses [(i.e. They are still immature) their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise, except in case of death] . And for those who are pregnant (whether they are divorced or their husbands are dead), their ‘iddah (prescribed period) is until they deliver (their burdens) (give birth) and whosoever fears Allah and keeps his duty to him, he will make his matter easy for him.”

Sura (65:4) lays down rules for divorce and sets the prescribed period for divorce. It clearly says, Muslim men can marry (and divorce) little girls who have not yet reached menstruation age. This means that Muslim men were allowed to marry baby girls. This is the eternal word of god. This is an eternal law of Allah. All Muslims must believe in this teaching. Otherwise, they are no longer Muslims but apostates of Islam.


Allah incites Muslim Jihadists to war for acquiring sex-slaves as booty

“All married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” 4:24

You can have sex with slaves women captured in war (with whom you may rape or do whatever you like).

Muhammad established an appalling precedent for abuse of young girls which is continued to be nurtured by the Muslim faithful. For example, Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran gave a fatwa about Quran 65.4:

“A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”

 

 

 

« Older entries